- Case intensifies long-standing concerns over corruption within bloc's institutions, fueling accusations of double standards

BRUSSELS

A sweeping fraud investigation targeting senior figures within the EU’s diplomatic apparatus has rattled Brussels, renewing long-standing concerns about corruption inside the bloc’s institutions.

On Dec. 2, Belgian police conducted early-morning raids at the European External Action Service (EEAS) in Brussels and the College of Europe in Bruges, detaining former EU foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini and senior European Commission official Stefano Sannino.

The probe, led by the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO), centers on suspected irregularities in a 2021-2022 tender for the creation of a new EU Diplomatic Academy.

Prosecutors say they have “strong suspicions” that the tender process “was not fair,” adding that, if substantiated, the alleged misconduct could amount to procurement fraud, corruption, conflict of interest, and breaches of professional secrecy.

Following the raids, Mogherini resigned as rector of the College of Europe and stepped down from leading the EU Diplomatic Academy, the project at the center of the investigation.

Her departure came a day after Sannino, former secretary-general of the EEAS and current head of the commission’s directorate for the Middle East, North Africa and the Gulf, announced he would retire at the end of December after being named a suspect.

Prosecutors suspect the College may have been given advance knowledge of the tender, potentially allowing it an unfair advantage over other universities and institutions eligible to bid.

EPPO's investigation is ongoing. Belgian authorities are expected to conduct further searches and interviews as they examine additional documents and communications related to the diplomatic academy project.

A broader pattern of scandals

The new investigation is the most serious case involving figures directly linked to the EU's diplomatic service and the commission in more than a decade. It comes on the heels of a string of corruption controversies that have fueled perceptions of systemic governance failures in Brussels.

2025 – Huawei

Earlier this year, Belgian prosecutors launched a bribery investigation into Huawei’s lobbying activities in Europe, targeting several European Parliament members. The probe targeted multiple members of the European Parliament (MEPs) and revived concerns that foreign governments and corporations are able to exploit vulnerabilities within EU rule-making structures.

According to prosecutors, between 2021 and 2025, Huawei representatives may have offered MEPs and their assistants bribes, lavish gifts, paid trips, including to China, and exclusive hospitality, in exchange for political support on critical EU matters.

Authorities raided 21 locations in Belgium and Portugal tied to Huawei-linked lobbyists. Several people have been arrested and charged with active corruption, participation in a criminal organization, and money laundering.

Both the European Parliament and European Commission have since blacklisted Huawei lobbyists.

2022 – Anti-corruption operation

In 2022, Belgian police arrested then-European Parliament Vice President Eva Kaili in a major anti-corruption operation. Authorities seized bags of cash alleged to be linked to attempts by Qatar to influence parliamentary decisions.

The operation implicated several MEPs and assistants and raised unprecedented questions about oversight of lobbying and foreign influence in the EU's only directly elected institution.

During initial raids, investigators reportedly seized roughly €1.5 million ($1.7 million) in cash, as well as computers and phones. Some of the money was found in the homes of MEPs or their associates.

The investigation remains ongoing. As of 2025, several more individuals have been charged in connection with the case, apart from the original suspects.

Qatar has denied any wrongdoing and called the allegations “baseless and gravely misinformed.”

No final verdict or comprehensive ruling has been issued, leaving many questions unresolved.

2020s – Pfizergate

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the European Commission under Ursula von der Leyen negotiated large vaccine purchases with Pfizer, securing hundreds of millions of doses for EU member states.

At the time, media reports revealed that von der Leyen and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla exchanged text messages in 2021-2022 as part of the negotiations. When journalists sought those messages under EU transparency rules, the commission stated it had no records.

In May, the EU General Court annulled the commission’s refusal, determining that text messages are considered “documents” under EU rules and should be retained and potentially disclosed. The court called the commission’s explanation “not credible.”
In 2022, the European Ombudsman had already condemned the commission for “maladministration” over the issue.

In July, the European Parliament agreed to debate a motion of censure against von der Leyen, accusing the commission of a lack of transparency by refusing to release the text message exchanges with Pfizer.

Von der Leyen defended herself during the parliamentary debate, dismissing the motion as divisive, and rejecting accusations of secrecy or misconduct.

While the motion failed, the challenge highlighted tensions within the EU about transparency, institutional accountability, and how the commission negotiates high-stakes deals.

2012 – Tobacco lobbying: Dalligate

Past cases include the 2012 resignation of EU Health Commissioner John Dalli over a tobacco lobbying scandal.

Major tobacco firms met extensively with national and EU officials, hiring consultants, funding studies, and pressuring member states to argue that stricter packaging and ingredient rules would harm jobs and tax revenue.

Tensions peaked in October 2012 when Dalli resigned after an OLAF probe found a Maltese associate allegedly offered to sway EU snus rules for money from Swedish Match, a tobacco company.


Dalli denied involvement, and no charges were filed; the industry also denied wrongdoing; however, health groups called for greater transparency.

1999 – Santer Commission resignation

In the late 1990s, serious concerns built up around the commission’s record in handling the EU’s community budget. The European Parliament’s Budgetary Control Committee refused to grant the formal approval of the budget, citing what it saw as a refusal by the commission to answer questions over alleged mismanagement.

Paul van Buitenen, a commission official and whistle-blower, submitted a report exposing alleged widespread fraud, obstruction of auditors and a “closed culture” intent on hiding the truth.

European Parliament’s report blamed not just individuals but systemic failure: a secretive bureaucracy, lack of accountability, poor audit and control, cronyism, and widespread institutional negligence.

In response, then-commission President Jacques Santer announced that all 20 commissioners would resign on 15 March 1999, a historic first for the European Commission.