Living under epidemics sows distrust in political institutions
Study shows young people who live through disease outbreaks are likely to trust governments less – especially democracies
Civic-minded activists have often bemoaned society’s widespread distrust in political institutions, in leaders, and in processes. As it turns out, that trend might end up getting only worse.
According to a significant new study, the coronavirus crisis is likely to erode young people’s trust in political institutions and leaders for decades to come.
In the study, published by the Systemic Risk Centre at the London School of Economics and Political Science, researchers looked at past health crises similar to the current one, trying to figure out how poor public health policy could sow deeper distrust in government among young people.
"We started by thinking about how we can actually learn from the past lessons, going back to past epidemics that have happened since the 1970s," explained Orkun Saka, assistant professor at the University of Sussex and visiting fellow at the London School of Economics, and one of the paper’s co-authors.
The study draws on one of the largest data sets (2006-2018 Gallup World Polls) available on confidence in political institutions, with some 750,000 respondents from 142 countries, said Saka.
"We checked whether or not every individual in our data set had exposure to a past crisis that may have happened since the 1970s," he said, adding that they also categorized people in terms of their extent of exposure to a past epidemic.
What the study shows, he added, is that when people are exposed to an epidemic in their impressionable years, they seem to have much less trust in political institutions.
"Here we are referring to the approval of national leaders, the confidence in the national government, and in the honesty of the national elections," he stressed.
According to the study, "an individual with the highest exposure to an epidemic is 7.2 percentage points less likely to have confidence in the honesty of elections; 5.1 percentage points less likely to have confidence in the national government; and 6.2 percentage points less likely to approve the performance of the political leader."
According to Saka, the pandemics make people not only blame the government or the leader, but lose their very faith in the political system.
Impressionable years critical
Saka also explained that an exposure to epidemics in impressionable years, a time window usually defined in psychology as the ages from 18 to 25, permanently shapes political opinion.
He said individuals who experience epidemics in their impressionable years show less confidence in political leaders, governments, and elections.
And, moreover, he said, this negative effect is large and persistent.
Poor public policy leads to deeper distrust
Economist Cevat Giray Aksoy of King's College London, another author of the paper, unpacked some consequences of this finding, saying this is especially important in terms of the future of democracies.
"When looked at by the negative effects for democracies and non-democracies, and also by income levels, we actually see that the effects are prevalent in all different groups,” he explained.
“But the magnitude of the effect is stronger for democratic governments."
This indicates that due to epidemics, individuals in democracies show a sharp erosion in their trust of political institutions.
The study shows that how governments handle epidemics plays a major role, Aksoy noted.
He added that governments’ ability to respond to crises through new policies actually determined individual satisfaction in political institutions.
If there is a poor public policy response, this is followed by a deeper distrust in governments, he warned.
He said this may be because of how democratic regimes are open, meaning that different, conflicting official views can be spread through media channels, leading to a larger blow to confidence.
COVID-19 impact could be larger
Aksoy also pointed to another important finding of the research, saying the negative effects it shows are probably at the lower end of the range, since the world has not seen an outbreak as bad as coronavirus in at least a century.
"So we think maybe the political legacy of this public enemy could actually be even larger," he said.
Echoing Aksoy, Saka said they are probably underestimating the virus’ impact on youth.
"It seems that for the next two decades, there will be a quite a bit of difference between someone who had an epidemic exposure and someone who didn't have an epidemic exposure in their impressionable years,” he explained.
For the next 20 years, these people are likely to differ in terms of how they see their political system, he said.
These persistent negative impacts, he added, are going to stay with the emerging generation for a long time to come, even after the rest of the world may have forgotten the pandemic.
On the other hand, Aksoy also pointed out that these effects vary sharply when broken down by different demographic groups.
For example, less-educated individuals developed more negative attitudes toward political institutions and leaders.
The negative impact also differs between urban and rural areas, with urban dwellers responding more negatively.
Women also show larger drops in confidence than men, according to the study.
The study concludes with the opinion of trust and confidence in governments are important for the capacity of a society to organize an effective collective response to an epidemic.
What is more, the negative impact of the virus on individuals, who are in their impressionable late-adolescent and early-adult years when an epidemic breaks out, is large and persistent.Anadolu Agency website contains only a portion of the news stories offered to subscribers in the AA News Broadcasting System (HAS), and in summarized form. Please contact us for subscription options.